Comfyui vs automatic1111 reddit. 1) in A1111. Automatic1111 is significantly faster though. I've moved from A1111 to ComfyUI, but one thing I'm really missing is the Restart sampler found in A1111. Genel olarak hem Stable Diffusion Youtube içeriklerinde hem de Reddit'te insanların Automatic1111'e burun kıvırıp ComfyUI kullanmaya başladığını görüyorum. Also, ComfyUI got the latest developments in Stable Diffusion AI (like Stable Cascade), while the implementation in A1111 comes later. ComfyUI also uses xformers by default, which is non-deterministic. AUTOMATIC1111 is the de facto GUI for Stable Diffusion. While kohya samples were very good comfyui tests were awful. (and a small commission to support this site if you sign up) ComfyUI vs AUTOMATIC1111. comfyui vs automatic1111 vs fooocus on AMD Discussion Yo, I have an AMD 6650xt and back in the day I didn't think about any AI related task and bought it, now which of the following or any other is compatible with it, any ideas/recommendation? Compare the features and drawbacks of Invokeai and automatic1111, two popular tools for stable diffusion. To be completely fair, I haven't used all my old extensions from automatic1111 yet, but the ones I have tried work nicely. I think for me at least for now with my current laptop using comfyUI is the way to go. This is where A1111 shines. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Reply reply More replies Top 1% Rank by size I believe that to get similar images you need to select CPU for the Automatic1111 setting Random number generator source. Edit2: A lot of people have said "it works fine on my machine, I have a 3060 with 12 GB of ram" and let me be the first to tell you not everyone has a modern gaming rig. Automatic1111 vs ComfyUI (Which one should you use???) - YouTube. I wont use comfyUI either because there are too many options for workflows and it leads to "the paradox of choice" which causes me to hate using it. For instance (word:1. A quality/performance comparison of the Fooocus image generation software vs Automatic1111 and ComfyUI. What's the propuse of the usage ComfyUI or Automatic1111 only? Can anyone enlight me about this? By the way, I'm new to this AI programs and I'm still learning Stable Diffusion. No negative prompt was used. It also doesn't match up with quite a number of people making comments today disputing this claim as they've also tested ComfyUI vs Automatic1111 and found it to be essentially the same performance. Like doing this : (close up:3) Just gets weird artifacts. Often referred to as Stable Diffusion Web UI, A1111 can become your go-to tool for its versatility and user-friendly design. I am completely new to this and wondering what the difference between A1111, controlNet, and comfyUI are? I know comfyUI and A1111 are GUIs but is there any significant difference between all three. I've been using Automatic1111 until some update lowered speed on old cards (GTX1660), then I had a break from SD, recently I tried ComfyUI, speed is great, but I feel lack of plenty of ease-of-use and workflow features Automatic1111 has. TLDRSpeed great, features great, ease of use of the charts, control net functionality flawless, install kind of clunky. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. It also seems like ComfyUI is way too intense on using heavier weights on (words:1. It is said to be very easy and afaik can "grow" with you as you learn more skills The TensorRT unet stuff recently released for Automatic1111 is pretty cool (not sure if it is out for ComfyUI yet?) Speeds up generation x2, I can make an SDXL image image in 6. Jan 26, 2024 · Performance: ComfyUI is generally faster than Automatic1111 and is better suited for creating many images with a singular workflow. They offer 20% extra credits to our readers. A1111 makes more sense to me. Hello! For many months I have worked with automatic1111 and cagliostro UI (automatic1111 derivative with better UI + QOL improvements) These interfaces are both wonderful and extremely powerful however I find their bugginess extremely annoying in that I am constantly having errors in my sessions on colab or rundiffusion because of bugginess that is inate to automatic1111- after about 20-60 When i ran the . Just wondering if you as a Programmer found the programmatic aspects of modifying Automatic1111 or ComfyUI better for your purposes? Unfortunately I dont have much space left on my computer, so I am wondering if I could install a version of automatic1111 that use the Loras and controlnet from ComfyUI. 35 GB I get 2. Shrug, guess it's what you need done and which you are comfortable with and prefer. Here are some examples I did generate using comfyUI + SDXL 1. 5 seconds now (with no Loras on a 3090) there is the 10-20 min wait to convert each model, but it is worth it to do your favorites. Why? its very simple, A1111 is performing 7 iterations in one second, comfyUI is taking 1. 23 GB Also, no offense but we should take the relative aggressive user group of comfyui into consideration when choosing software Easy diffusion vs automatic1111 Question | Help Ok, so I've been using easy diffusion UI for a year now and the devs announced this week that they will no longer be updating/supporting 😕 so why not finally join most and use automatic1111 The video was pretty interesting, beyond the A1111 vs. Got a 12gb 6700xt, set up the AMD branch of automatic1111, and even at 512x512 it runs out of memory half the time. After learning auto1111 for a week, I'm switching to Comfy due the rudimentary nature of extensions for everything and persisting memory issues with my 6GB GXT1660. If you run into install problems, just reboot PC, and it finishes. In comfyui running same prompt as automatic1111…. Fooocus is also very nice to use. Their unified canvas is awesome too. 5 seconds to perform one iteration, therefore ComfyUI is slower. Using ComfyUI was a better experience the images took around 1:50mns to 2:25mns 1024x1024 / 1024x768 all with the refiner. My guess -- and it's purely a guess -- is that ComfyUI wasn't using the best cross-attention optimization. The checkpoint model was SDXL Base v1. Aug 19, 2023 · Whenever you migrate from the Stable Diffusion webui known as automatic1111 to the modern and more powerful ComfyUI, you’ll be facing some issues to get started easily. So from that aspect, they'll never give the same results unless you set A1111 to use the CPU for the seed. 1. ComfyUI + SD-Next (A1111 fork with much better handling of SD-XL and Diffusers in general) give you the most options. ComfyUI uses the CPU for seeding, A1111 uses the GPU. Is there a reason. ComfyUI on the other hand, if you got your hands on the fitting tutorials, gave me the possibility to generate a picture by combining multiple IP adapters with a regional prompt. I'm unsure if setting A1111 Emphasis mode (in Settings - Stable Diffusion) to 'No Norm' will fix this, but seems worth a try. Most of my work is inpainting, upscaling, Krita editing, rerunning, and model swapping to get very exact results. Lacks the extension and other functionalities, but is amazing if all you need to do is generate images. Hello! Looking to dive into animatediff and am looking to learn from the mistakes of those that walked the path before me🫡🙌🫡🙌🫡🙌🫡🙌 Are people using… Went back to automatic1111. Comfy speed comparison. Fooocus / Fooocus-MRE / RuinedFooocus - quick image generation, and simple and easy to use GUI (Based on the Comfy backend). I don't like having to build the nodes in comfyui, and I admit I didnt spend more than three weeks in it, but often times when trying to be creative i could never get the nodes to work together. Comfy has clearly taken a smart and logical approach with the workflow GUI, at least from a programmer's point of view. Mainly, a unified, simple to use inpainting ux and a strong prompting system. I'd recommend studying their prompting system and keywords. Automatic1111 is still popular and does a lot of things ComfyUI can't. Either you use Invoke AI (the true superior inpainting/outpainting solution), or you use A1111 and any of their fo I've been using Automatic1111, and I've managed to do some programmatic things with it, kinda a pain and for myself, the UI always feels like a pain for me to use. mostly built for SDXL and uses comfyUI as its backend, making it as fast and as VRAM efficient as comfyui has few options, but includes mostly what matters comes with a list of effective and easy-to-use styles I often get artifacts and weird blotches. I did two things to have ComfyUI glom on to Automatic1111 (write up: AI Art with ComfyUI and Stable Diffusion SDXL — Day Zero Basics For an Automatic1111 User | by Eric Richards | Jul, 2023 | Medium) Editing the ComfyUI configuration file to add the base directory of Automatic1111 for all the models and embeddings and stuff. Lately I've been spending a lot more time in ComfyUI because after getting over the hurdle of working with nodes I'm enjoying the ability to set up repeatable workflows, and also using workflows that others have created. I used automatic1111 last year with my 8gb gtx1080 and could usually go up to around 1024x1024 before running into memory issues. Automatic1111 is giving me 18-25it/s vs invokes 12-17ish it/s. Comfyui is more fit to be used in a production environment than A1111. You have to draw a mask, save the image with the mask, then upload to the UI again to inpaint. Then i tested my previous loras with comfyui they sucked also. What's the diffirence between them. But in auto1111 it renders fine. The big current advantage of ComfyUI over Automatic1111 is it appears to handle VRAM much better. And nobody in their right mind use basic comfy inpainting nodes. I get 2. ComfyUI lives in its own directory. Currently, you can use our one-click install with Automatic1111, Comfy UI, and SD. 0. Hi all! We are introducing Stability Matrix - a free and open-source Desktop App to simplify installing and updating Stable Diffusion Web UIs. Leave all your other models on the external drive, and use the command line argument --ckpt-dir to point to the models on the external drive (SD will always look in both locations). And it runs Automatic1111 1. A1111 has basic SD-XL support, but without huge internal changes it won't keep up with SD-Next and ComfyUI. With integrated graphics, it goes cpu only and sucks. ComfyUI vs A1111 Question - Help /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper As far as I can tell, how prompt weighting is handled is one of the key differences between ComfyUI and A1111 (A1111 does some kind of normalization I think). Prompt: a frightened 30 year old woman in a futuristic spacesuit runs through an alien jungle from a terrible huge ugly monster against the background of two moons. 11 s/it in Automatic1111, the peak VRAM is 4. I don't like the overhead as it harkens back to Automatic1111's clusterbomb of technical debt. “(Composition) will be different between comfyui and a1111 due to various reasons”. 5 perfectly well but not Automatic1111 SDXL while ComfyUI does. This is Reddit's home for Computer Role Playing Games, better known as the CRPG subgenre! CRPGs are characterized by the adaptation of pen-and-paper RPG, or tabletop RPGs, to computers (and later, consoles. Seems reasonable. Is it even possible ? Share Add a Comment Then moved onto AUTOMATIC1111 because of all the features it had. For some workflows or steps in a complete workflow ComfyUI is better, for others SD-Next is better, so I would use both. What I would like to do is just simply replicate the Restart sampler from A1111 in ComfyUI (to start with). Here's a comparison. I cant think if anything comfyui can do that I cant do in automatic1111. If I understand correctly, these are just frontend UIs for what is essentially the same core backend, although Automatic1111 has more access to more external features. Asked reddit wtf is going on everyone blindly copy pasted the same thing over and over. In this video I go over the difference between Automatic1111 and ComfyUI and which one is better to use for stable Invoke just released 3. It does everything I need much more easily than ComfyUI. On my 12GB 3060, A1111 can't generate a single SDXL 1024x1024 image without using RAM for VRAM at some point near the end of generation, even with --medvram set. I am still unsure what controlNet is for but I see multiple vid2vids on YT using it with other stuff and just curious if anyone can fill me in on Jul 6, 2024 · Check out Think Diffusion for a fully managed ComfyUI online service. Should you use ComfyUI instead of AUTOMATIC1111? Here’s a comparison. I don't do a lot of just prompt and run work (which ComfyUI) is just as good as if not much better at. I realize one shouldn’t go that high with the multiplier. Tested failed loras with a1111 they were great. Nobody ever thought that Comfy Inpainting was even good to start with. Video seems to be more friendly in comfyUI, but I have managed it in Automatic1111 as well. Bunun genel sebebi olarak da yeni modellerin, yeni içeriklerin ComfyUI tarafında daha hızlı ilerlediğini, Automatic1111'in atıl kaldığını iddia ediyorlar. Multiple step workflow can be instantly resumed and backup in comfyui, worflow that would require several A1111 tabs with settings that can't be properly resumed outside doing it manually. Run it on a ryzen + amd system. 0 with refiner. At some point I also tested EasyDiffusion, but it was well, easy, nothing fancy. A non-destructive workflow is a workflow where you can reverse and redo something earlier in the pipeline after working on later steps. While FooocusUI is super simple to use, stupid easy, it suffers from the fact that the creator make it too easy to use, its so dumbed down that its been stripped of all the things that make A1111 here i have explained all in below videos for automatic1111 but in any case i am also planning to move Vladmandic for future videos since automatic1111 didnt approve any updates over 3 weeks now torch xformers below 1 : How To Install New DREAMBOOTH & Torch 2 On Automatic1111 Web UI PC For Epic Performance Gains Guide ComfyUI got attention recently because the developer works for StabilityAI and was able to be the first to get SDXL running. One thing I noticed right away when using Automatic1111 is that the processing time is taking a lot longer. I have a 4090 so speed isnt an issue Aug 11, 2024 · While ComfyUI provides granular control over every step of the creative process, it can be overwhelming for those who prefer a more streamlined approach. . Join the discussion on Reddit. So you can install it and run it and every other program on your hard disk will stay exactly the same. 5 and 2. 1) in ComfyUI is much stronger than (word:1. Still slow, about a minute per image, a couple of doing 60+ passes. If there is someone who will help me out my journey on this technology, i'll appreciate it! I do like that Comfy has everything disabled by default, and can save workflows, but automatic1111 offers the same save capabilities. We know A1111 was using xformers, but weren't told, as far as i noticed, what ComfyUI was using. 35 s/it in comfyui, the peak VRAM is 4. Mar 21, 2024 · ComfyUI and Automatic1111 Stable Diffusion WebUI are two open-source applications that enable you to generate images with diffusion models. Don't know if inpainting works with SDXL, but ComfyUI inpainting works with SD 1. Next (Vladmandic), VoltaML, InvokeAI, and Fooocus. bat for Automatic1111 on the WSL i will Kill the program/python since my RAM is maxed out. However, if you wish to spend time carefully fixing and enhancing the details of a single image, Automatic1111 might be more suitable. If someone with 32GB of ram can try and share what their finding will it work or not can share here since not many info known for Automatic1111 for WSL window+AMD GPU /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. Automatic1111 vs InvokeAI - pros and cons Discussion I have been watching videos on InbokeAI for the last couple of weeks, and it seems to be overall a much more polished version of Automatic1111, which much better inpainting and outpainting, however, it seems to lack X/Y plot which I use pretty much every time to compare results between models I am fairly new to using Stable Diffusion, first generating images on Civitai, then ComfyUI and now I just downloaded the newest version of Automatic1111 webui. Lastly, inpainting in ComfyUI isn't much fun yet I may have to use this one for fixes. (changes seeds drastically; use CPU to produce the same picture across different videocard vendors; use NV to produce same picture as on NVidia videocards) It is true that A1111 and ComfyUI weight the prompts differently. I found ComfyUI_restart_sampling custom node, but it's a bit more complicated. Fooocus vs ComfyUI vs AUTOMATIC1111 ? Question - Help I am an absolute beginner in photo editing I have used some basic tools in photoshop and generative AI, I don't know which GUI to use, I will be mostly using inpaint, outpaint and text generation. Automatic1111 for multiple workflows and extensions. Best: ComfyUI, but it has a steep learning curve Easiest-ish: A1111 might not be absolutely easiest UI out there, but that's offset by the fact that it has by far the most users - tutorials and help is easy to find Easiest: Check Fooocus. I think the noise is also generated differently where A1111 uses GPU by default and ComfyUI uses CPU by default, which makes using the same seed give different results. 0 that ads controlnet and a node based backend that you can use for plugins etc so seems a big teams finally taking node based expansion serious i love comfy but a bigger team and really nice ui with node plugin support gives serious potential to them… wonder if comfy and invoke will somehow work together or if things will stay fragmented between all the various The main difference between ComfyUI and Automatic1111 is that Comfy uses a non-destructive workflow. This doesn't tell me a whole lot and doesn't account for strict testing meaning it is essentially invalid. Currently i'm stuck there. \stable-diffusion-webui\models\Stable-diffusion. ) If you're using AUTOMATIC1111, leave your SD on the SSD and only keep models that you use very often in . 2) and just gives weird results. My graphics card begins with a "2", you guys. That is the important thing. And neither cmdr2/stable-diffusion-ui nor ComfyUI has the nice UI for previewing Loras or textual inversions based on an example image that Automatic1111 has. Invoke has a far superior ui and I like how it displays a history of all my outputs with the seed and prompt data ready to “rewind” any mistakes I make. Maybe I am doing it wrong, but ComfyUI inpainting is a bit awkward to use. I've put in the --xformers launch command but can't get it working with my AMD card. I use openvino on my an Intel I-5 1st gen laptop. ynerx awzefdj bdlg oymsl yfa tncs vhulo wihm ofgnfds umvr